About the Project
Equity Multiple needed a redesign to the resources center to comply with usability's best practices and improve discoverability and suggestions of relevant articles tailored to the user's preference and needs.
The resources center had a high bounce rate and the discoverability of articles, had limited search preference, and filters did not curate the content to the user's liking. How might we make Equity Multiple investment resources discoverable and match user's preferences?
It was essential to understand what were the major pain points. We relied on usage metrics and subject-matter experts to understand where those pain points were.
1. Lack of discoverability.
2. Inability to filter.
3. Trusting articles sources,
4. Overwhelming amounts of unorganized articles.
The client provided us with several assets like user interview data and user personas done previously within the company that could help save time to go directly to designing.
However, I advocated to conduct user interviews again for the following reasons:
1. Lack of Problem Space Related Questions
Users were asked questions specific to a completely different problem space than the one we were currently solving.
2. Knowing the "Why"
There was not enough quantitative data to even understand general user behaviors.
First Target User
A user who has made one or more investments through Equity Multiple.
Second Target User
A user interested in investing in real estate and interested in investing in platforms like Equity Multiple..
Our target users were niche users that were difficult to recruit without external third-party user research platforms. The client also was unable to provide us with users to research with; as a team, we were hit with a blocker.
We decided to pivot by zooming out and recruiting complementary users. This type of audience invests, but just not necessarily in real estate.
1. Have experience in investing, whether in the private or public market.
2. Have invested in real-estate or any types of investment.
I conducted usability testing on five users to observe the user's pain point and behaviors in real time so that I could understand how they currently find their resources.
We started brainstorming sketches and came up with conceptual designs to visualize and identify what would work and what wouldn’t.
Transforming sketches into Mid-Fidelity wireframes
We iterated to a high-fidelity design based on user's feedback and
needs collected from our mid-fidelity designs.
1. Navigating Ambiguity
Acknowledging that it’s okay if we don't have the answers for everything. It’s learning by doing and finding things out along the process.
2. Scalability
I wish I understood the business value behind resources redesign; what kind of business need does it achieve? Usually, an investment in UX means a business need is backing it up.
Additional Discussions
Points which are not covered but could be worth discussing
1. Heuristic Evaluation
2. COVID Impact
3. Information Architecture of the Navigation
4. Overwhelming amounts of unorganized articles.
Thanks for making it this far. Here’s a GIF for you